we know right , that the current treaties very are not sufficient and that in the future is necessary to develop better and union different structure , therefore perustuslaillisempi structure , which also expresses more clearly , what member states and the union is . 
firstly , kohtaamiemme economic and social difficulties , is there , although it is a sustainable growth and the years efforts , all our citizens from . 
the situation , which is unacceptable particularly many for transport and agriculture , which is , improve . 
procedures on in itself is a good thing , but is ensure the , that system is to be political we have ever suffered . 
they too is now clear of rights , which in their must measures . 
i agree with his with , when he warned some of bizarre return to intergovernmental methods . 
many of us want national member states of federation . 
the rapporteurs have stressed debate quality and also the need to further , of course , . i can other than agree with them . 
them i say that , as before , must speech is to be at the time and situation , because political speech must always be realistic and linked to real situation and objectives , which we all share . 
i would like , that this this reinforced cooperation and to the through some examples of the european new opportunities . 
the vote will take place today at 12.30 p.m . 
the commission is cannot accept amendment no 12 . 
i am voting for invested a considerable amount . 
also the european court of auditors reports constantly is the this failure , which is greece portugal . 
this is , we voted for report . 
of the such buses are not only more and internationally for but also more environmentally friendly , because they consume less fuel passengers towards . 
report is also benchmarking best practices to the eu : in . 
binding and all a charter of fundamental rights , which would completely legally binding rights , could lead to difficulties at a later stage . 
i thank them both their excellent work . 
we believe that it is cannot but to already less than three months ' time in nice , which is why we already only this is why we cannot support it , that charter of fundamental rights in the treaty nice summit . 
- ( de ) csu the of the european parliament group is welcome the proposal before us , that the charter of fundamental rights together one and is visible citizens : the fundamental rights eu institutions and the plants . 
charter of fundamental rights of the the liberal europe . 
actually i would have liked this charter of fundamental rights freezing of assets , so that should have been to the work on , as very many ngos different union countries propose . 
queiró , on behalf report ( a5-0248 / 2000 ) the european union hungary on accession negotiations and progress ( com ( 1999 ) 505 - c5-0028 / 2000 - 1997 / 2175 ( cos ) ) ; 
it therefore i would like proposes , that parliament is you no longer be a next year at all yleismietintöä but mere individual candidate countries on reports , so that we clear , that we negotiations differentiated progress . 
i also to it , that previous presidencies and the commission the preparations for the presidency france can , at least i hope , to the council nice meeting quite precise of it . 
i said it and i can say the very now , that the france is leave any in difficulties , which is of course , that we should not time and means to each of the . 
this question is , of course , fully justified , but the is to right and exactly . 
enlargement for the , and we have is to the agreements and visionary . 
which any intergovernmental conference result is enough to satisfy the enlargement enormous mukautumispainetta . 
the second great change , which we have witnessed and which the european must to , is market and economic competition rapid change in a . 
fourthly : the is the second principle , that they countries , which have later , is fair opportunity to join the , which have earlier . 
if eu : the level we need to achieve great and long-term investment , should think it , that member states are mean less pollution have in such cases the long transitional periods . 
start and crime torjunnassakin apply we countries quickly come up and the european cooperation interests . 
let us bigger trade flows , which are now the european union and central and eastern european countries between . 
i was pleased that the commission , the commissioner now finally started to citizens , that the fears , which is been , is need be . 
one thing is clear , however , - and i welcome the commission , that mr verheugen stressed it yet again the rules respect for democracy is to be transitional period . 
we need this the commission , because although we aid is will , we sometimes lacks the means . 
this is necessary , so that the european union we can to ourselves objectives own internal instructed the reforms . 
some important aspects and issues but we different with . 
this jeopardise the european union , the its independence in the future north america the and also the european common security and defence policy , because it that the also russia and other countries relations the risks . 
we hope , that is results and that enlargement for measures need to second the intergovernmental conference . 
. ( fr ) i briefly , as i did already , because i three minutes my first speech , unused . 
this is very important , and this point of view i am pleased that the commission , working on information campaign , which the commission commissioner verheugen wants and broad that decentralised . 
however , and this is the last words , because i would like , that me is right : i not , when , i playing half-heartedly , i would like , that enlargement is to so that could also be credible , is seriously , to ymmärretyiksi and be able to join peoples , and the candidate countries peoples that its own our people . 
this , i think is not necessary to discuss the financial perspective in enlargement . 
i say of it you this on any country . 
they said , the same reason the european union to join in . 
now i speak rapporteurs . 
me is been luottamustehtävä measures estonia on report as rapporteur . 
the moderate party , i very taxpayers ' money thriftily . 
i believe , that only it , you will find what they are , have a last years in . 
is not enough , the strategy is to more citizens . 
lithuania is a opportunity long-term economic growth . 
widest sense it is the european union and russia federation between cooperation . 
this is the second regrettable point : public opinion the european union support and the outside . 
wise a , foreign direct investment a was last in more than eur 5,45 billion . 
we should not to the , is especially we german . 
slovakia democracy is firmly , what we is been toisenkinlaisia experience . 
in this speech i to systematically the six points , which hungary , the situation is reason to stress the european union , the . 
therefore i pleased to see , that this subject was mr brok report , which was enlargement in general . 
this is not in any so true than nuclear power , which nuclear and take due the legitimate concerns are at risk to nuclear lobby against omimiksi . 
the level of of is a matter , i thank my colleagues and . 
in this report , which i is honour to present you and which also approved in committee unanimously , states , that legal authorities persuasion in the copenhagen political criteria are met . 
in this respect key is foreign and security policy high representatives javier solana , that without it , of course , in any way to reduce the commission role . 
malta is the problem but still it , that government and opposition are accession process different way , the european union and appreciates it , that this accession process is the . 
even the usa and the mexico varallisuustasot are closer to each other . that is why we support the internal market in a , flexible and demands the right how can a humane strategy . 
let me say in this context it , that also respect central and eastern european countries citizens , which ten years ago rohkenivat to the streets and to this process . 
the information society is important and new that new industries . 
we must to national legislation which is embodied community law favour be blinded by us . 
new , 10 eastern europe country is not this rich 00 . 
this is also live animal transport at , which is inhuman . 
now we shall now proceed demand for assessment all important legislation . 
in my must of course to the european union and it also must to , that the european regional development funds is to be the only on the laskennallisin regions and circles between . 
mr elmar brok referred to in his speech to rightly , that we all benefit from enlargement , particularly in this six months are apprehended irregularly crossing the we . 
rough is in the future great importance for environmental reasons , because we is to massatavarat out from road , and if we cannot be the by rail , we is to look at the waterways . 
also selfishness and populism are increased , and the euro more rate is hardly helped this . 
our message candidate countries , is that do not let the reports before us and cases the confuse head . 
unfortunately , this is currently too much parties , which are have ideology purveyed by and show therefore too little signs ideals and too much scorn for human dignity . 
if the and want free hankintaoikeutta perhekäyttöön is postponed , let us so . 
this will is still there , but it can jeopardise bureaucratic lack of transparency and some governments obvious , but is public resistance . 
where otherwise are maastricht treaty the promised millions of jobs ? 
when we currently being reviewed the treaties , some member states are already new reform . 
most international studies show , that enlargement is macro-economic benefit . 
small minorities , from no political group is but not the main objective , which slovenia policy is to join the european union as soon as possible . 
when the union quickly , should it strongly decentralize , as the eldr group laajentumiskannanotossa is . 
me was clear , that laitosmainen , säntillinen system , which in that country is , lead to many primarily at orphans and long-term effects on health . 
i would ask that this , the proposals supports . 
even we , european politicians , is too little knowledge of . 
cyprus will a bridge between the countries . 
i wish negotiators constant success their work in this important fact . 
also some other form communications is of course important member states and candidate countries between , so that information on the european union , what is it . 
we is not to lose more 1990s the pace . 
mr president , first i would like the socialist group position say romania to congratulate the rapporteur on his report excellent report . 
institutions , member states and we all , is it the , that we are challenge match for , so that we can also to each country citizens fears and to the european founders innoittaneen spirit , and to view . 
i is unfortunately a the , that many fine words and many figures hard opening and closure , the council is not driven this enlargement process with the political with . 
many union countries have have similar problems in development stage and can advise bulgaria and help it to cope with the problems , which because this currently is . 
democracy is not only majorities issue , but before all also minorities should to properly decision-making . 
candidate countries will be equal and the accession will depend on only for the development . 
the same time we should recognise lithuania countries such as the efforts lost for to . 
is this , we interests in to justice and vapausjärjestelmäämme romania , and this is certainly a argument citizens with the critical debate . 
a question , supports clearly , namely enlargement . 
my group therefore supports transitional periods of up to five years . 
mr president , we is necessary to positive movement enlargement . 
the debate these countries liittymisjärjestyksestä is , open , therefore , that is also todennettava , how very they progress within its reforms . 
i am pleased , that report is the positive view and so that slovenia - and delegation as i have to ensure the often , and also the commissioner is many times been delegation in - is made really much to meet criteria . 
i think the proposal is worth . 
these forms of violence and trafficking in women is condemn already now all way and in the eu in the candidate countries , and that the fight against is . 
finally , i would like to take this opportunity jakaakseni many members ideas and the problems , that is finally to question the european borders and enlargement consequences and the european parliament and the report . 
minutes of yesterday 's sitting the is been distributed . 
you . 
time time parliament states quite right , that citizens europe is a europe , which is rights properly in union legislation . 
i will vote legal and the internal market the siirtopyynnöstä . 
we know , that they foreign substances , which now we are talking about , are rarely dangerous toxins immediately , but they are long-term , long-lived and solve the substances , as dioxin , aflatoxin and heavy metals such as cadmium , lead and mercury . 
we can find guilty . 
if this laimentaminen allows , it is at least to supervisory instances , and is publish , that is laimentamista , because this problem is also to and the debate is public . 
as this is stress clearly the dioxin crisis was there the rules against criminals measures result . 
mr president , the thanks to members , which took the floor before me . 
this approach was absolutely . 
for example fishmeal , the limit value from ei-merellisille eläintuotteille proposed of . 
it is time to the principle of subsidiarity misleading interpretation , which is from the second kansakuntiamme brussels subjugation . 
the rapporteur , i it with , that is justified to all this and to his has said substances then , when they are not in itself , but the toxic kertymien to is increased . 
unfortunately , a part of perimätiedosta , i should like to healthy , is lost in agriculture , which animals are only manufacturing units and commodities . the . 
new regulations neighbours will be , harmonisation and simplify the very detailed and complex comparability between hospitals ' , which was earlier ripoteltu many different directives . 
the people , which ask ingredients very carefully , is i single occasion the relatively little . 
secondly : it to well but the situation for farmers , which are outside sources for our producers . their is to be much greater rehuaine-eriä . 
compensation is necessary , although is clear , that farmers myself are great concern produce their own livestock welfare . 
amendment no 18 the proposes the inclusion of water feed the . 
the commission proposes scientific risk assessments carried out on the basis of member states appropriate measures , so that the presence of feed can to . 
when takes account of the amendments , which is acceptable in this plenary , i , that parliament supports the proposal . 
the commission can therefore all , accept amendment no 15 completely 27 : of . 
i assume , that the it is not a success in this time . 
the commission is promised to work it on and is also announced that list , not prepared following morning by . 
farmers is quite simply to know more , and at least the percentage rate when commission what is going , what all and where extent these rehuseokset contain . 
finally , i would like to thank the rapporteur warmly , mr graefe zu baringdorf , and also mr roth-behrendt their reports here and i hope , that the council will take this issue constructive attitude and that we can create therefore together feed of on open system . 
all this is the bse crisis was of course , a whole book , which is a number of figures . 
is cannot accept harmful substances , which affect human and animal health . 
let us but positive of . 
the proposal before us is start many initiatives , which based on the security on the white paper . 
thank you very much , mr the commissioner . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
nicholson of winterbourne , on behalf committee on foreign affairs , human rights and common security and defence policy committee report ( a5-0247 / 2000 ) romania on the european union and for negotiations of ( com ( 1999 ) 510 c5-0033 / 2000 1997 / 2171 ( cos ) ) 
the third and perhaps they can least take the condition is it , that the council is new toimielinjärjestelyistä , which , community can measures effectively and democratically after enlargement . 
although article 13 principles we accept , is clear , that the european union the through secondary legislation goes in some cases very far and that of the candidate countries cannot be right to different culture . 
i finally , that the enlargement process is to gradually it more than the candidate countries meet requirements . 
. ( es ) takes account of the current situation and when they cast , which are begun the european union question enlargement , is important , that parliament a clear political signal to enlargement for . 
the european union to is the establishment , been peoples to . 
the 1993 the copenhagen european council criteria democratisation or competition capacity for resistance confirm ' community acquis ' disguised wild and disastrous of power . 
enlargement remnants of this situation may is there here just food products but populist aims and not just movements of . 
we is just this sitting the women and men equal opportunities on report , which be aware again , how bad community acquis situation is in practice in this area just . 
who could be represent the kopernikuksen and the john paul ii : the puolalta , budapest marttyyrikohtalon in 1956 kokeneelta unkarilta or as a symbol muodostuneelta pääkaupungilta , prahalta , which kansandemokratiat heads of state and syrjäyttivät were no small entrepreneurs freedom for murhatuksi people jan palachin people . 
greater europe , which is more tasks and responsibilities , needs new and greater resources . 
i welcome estonia elderly and pensioners and i hope , that the european union ensuring their elinmahdollisuuksistaan . 
if latvia is continue to and the european union to renewing its institutional framework and policies for enlargement , i see no reason why latvia , is to be union accession . 
if lithuania is continue to and the european union to renewing its institutional framework and policies for enlargement , i see no reason why lithuania , is to be union accession . 
progress is happened clearly also environmental , because poland is set up national ympäristösuojelurahaston and taken to the polluter pays principle . 
by poland common taloomme union shows justice new entrant to the justice , which it is without had long to . 
i , that the czech republic is soon to union . 
. ( i ) i welcome queiró report , which the hungary application of the european union , and i agree with most of his their conclusions . 
i , that bulgaria is in the near future union accession . 
poos report ( a5-0249 / 2000 ) 
it is balanced and fair position , which the council of ministers is be seriously into account . 
i hope this , , that the united nations under in negotiations to a conclusion , that cyprus greek and turkish proportion could together with the enjoy the benefits combined republic . 
. ( i ) i warmly poos report , which the cyprus application of the european union . 
we consumers we but food chain last link , and food in the vilpit and injustice the finally us . 
we particularly important that the european level , it ensure food safety from farm to table specific , table fork band of . 
just therefore , that we really veljellisten and really yhdenveroisten when development all the countries with , we will not guarantee such naamiaisia by voting for the . 
the council informed this parliament before valiokuntaäänestystä but only little before , when it deliberately excluded from to discuss this to me i or parliament with . 
in my report i called for , that ngos representativeness and participation in , that they are more more responsible for parliament , that action programme is annual report for the parliament , that is open as possible action programme , that past knowledge to prejudice in the fight against discrimination and that indeed recognised . 
the is to the workers legitimate interests . 
social partners is päävastuullisina discrimination at work on the questions regulation the best conditions to practical solutions . 
jenny was access charterista , he was the coordinator , and i him article 13 on hearing . 
the practice therefore , that directives and action plans to it , that member states reject the same discrimination and the from that the commission can to role , agreements protected so also social debate in . 
although the current legal basis to appropriations new preparatory measures for , programme of this category could lead to other policies reducing appropriations . 
ladies and gentlemen , we for a framework directive , which is necessary but not sufficient and which we mechanisms is refine the opportunity ago , when it is to apply . 
i hope , that the commission will carefully gender discrimination based on the new directive on the basis of this legislation . 
i congratulate the commission and my colleagues have delivered their opinions report . 
i pleased mann report statement , which vakaumuksellisille organisations to the future cases the to staff , the requirements of this background , . 
mr commissioner , the commission how it quickly institutions are used amsterdam treaty the new powers , shows the european union is still in the area , and i would like to thank the european the commission the right emphatically . 
mr cashman 's report , what respect of various forms of discrimination exist in our societies to the importance of the action programme before us . 
mr president , i would like bonino list for to the bewildered outrage the , which we this way the european union , which the member states and are discrimination , racism and xenophobia to . 
can the commissioner to explain why the commission , ignore this ? 
the second problem is i think it , that ngos , so important as they are , calls for to programme of the size , and by type of action , . 
liberal democrats will be unanimously and had welcome all this , but in particular parliament action , which is wanted to stress and also before all phenomenon prevention and good practice . 
it is challenge us all , because we all condemn the people ensivaikutelman . 
mr president , the fight against discrimination and discrimination against legislation of the recognition of the means , that discrimination is and that it is in many cases ' legal ' , because it is become so normal . 
un : the trade and unctad unctad presented the first in geneva in 1963 kompensoivan inequality , discrimination principle . 
notices and awareness will is in fact this area fundamental importance , the act is the them as a new mentality and of iskostamiseksi , so that people between the prejudice still to to eradicate uprooted and to guarantee to all citizens real equality law the . 
therefore , is important that , in these two now before us is a legislative proposal , although the , is to improve some , and programme to finance for appropriations is to way , which reflects combating discrimination political importance . 
particularly agreement , which concerns sweden and ireland from which reasonable adjustments principle , ensure now , that the european employers the coordinate their judicial policies their jobs , purchase special instruments and change working methods , so that disabled people employees really is fair opportunities . 
article 13 is the eu : the new objective : article , reasons the citizens discrimination or difference in treatment in . 
secondly , i would like to refer to the commission , that is the first package , unfortunately , done a mistake in possible grounds for discrimination priorities . 
mr president , religion of discrimination is cannot accept the more than other forms of discrimination . 
as a convinced ateistina i not this idea . 
the idea noble , that each citizen to the possible freedom , as long as it is the extent yhteismitallinen other people freedom with , is today often obstacles , which others the rely in and others justice . 
the second directive is already adopted in record time , and i hopeful the , that the second is the french presidency in november . 
some are contrary to other legal requirements with , for example komiteajärjestelyjä on amendment no with . 
i it cannot accept amendment no , 38 , which proposes , that article 5 is list of cases , which also of different treatment could be justified . 
you have the important question , which the agreements point . 
we now first again common projects in this action programme . 
that is clear , what maailmanlaajuisemmat rules are , it more effective they are . 
rules 7 article member states to prevent arms ohjautuminen ei-toivottaville the . 
. ( it ) mr president , i muistelevani kaihoisasti the times , when the european parliament and also different groupings that are present and trade unions called think and to a civil one to reduce gradually and when was , as far as to how to civil for products tuotannoksi . 
when takes account of our planet and our continent the current situation cold war , and the balance are weapons of mass destruction , threat , this procedure should irresponsible . 
these weapons is become , in many places the world of the anarchy . 
cfsp : to is kriisientorjuntatoimintaa : the eu borders , and not outside the no a , which could be must puolustuspolitiikkana . 
the aim is to prevent arms exports human rights loukkaaville governments , areas of conflict or military research than any the regions . 
the commission was in close cooperation with member states actively involved in traffic and light weapons on the european union common action . 
the next item is the commission communication european research area . 
pitempiaikaisten practice ; the hanketukien and institutional funding fact , the treaty of perusmuodoltaan of instruments and in particular the use of union participation national programmes in article 169 of the treaty . 
we want to before all measures classification , which depends on the practice . 
say , that you think framework programme is a comprehensive restructuring . 
i i think we need now something a , which can to european research area structure , in other , something more than national programmes the framework programme ; we need structures muokkaavan instrument , which means it , that is adopt different approaches . 
being myself a co-founder on , i it with , that we is to something together , because it is also parliament , the joint research centre and different member states to research institutes . 
it seems , that the commission is quickly european tiedealueen to . 
communication is a whole figure , which is the subject of science , society and citizens . 
greece , ireland and portugal authorities is been contact and these countries is been asked to speed up governments the cohesion fund of with its projects by the commission . 
perhaps you mentioned in the commission has just been exclusively with the cohesion fund , which is no longer unit , there should not allowed havainnollisempien access to information . 
the second question is this : the cohesion fund , there is community aid , the structural funds , alueohjelmat and other . what countries have received the final projects and what programmes have already adopted what country ? 
in 1989 the commission made a new proposal , which was to provide more flexibility . 
i commissioner bolkestein by the commission aspects and i know that the treaties , the prohibits the veloittamasta from foreign companies more than kotimaisilta companies , but in europe should apply honest competition the general law and we should to competition law impact situations , which verotusasteet are fully multilateralism , although general rule is that these things are , of the member states . 
if you want to save fuel , is reduced rates of fuel and other taxes through . 
. ( i ) i would like to say that mr purvis , the location unfavourable role is national governments thing , because of the voters live these peripheral and peripheral regions . 
mr president , mr commissioner , thank you for your information the commission . 
the european commission made last spring and summer general report work and henkilöresursseistaan . 
i have heard such information . 
these children use a growing extent for , and businessmen , which arena often are european . 
the commission believes that all companies can , in time for the introduction of the euro final and also to tietokonejärjestelmänsä and ohjelmistonsa . 
this philosophical political the debate is not timely , but we can no longer perhaps to discuss generally referendum dangers in other context . 
this is also do not hunt elk . 
the french authorities is recently sent reminder . 
. ( i ) i can tell you , that the candidate countries , with is been meetings animal transport and the initial agreements this is achieved . 
the commission but of this year kevätkylvökaudella cases , which the eu to was been such erilajisten traditional plant , also cotton , seed , which spoke of genetically modified signs of a greater . 
i can but his staff to hear to you , that privately or in the workplace in tietokonelaitteiden essential safety standards for is a directive on electronic , pienjännitedirektiivissä , and radio and the directive telepäätelaitteista . 
is he agree with me , that this is the but incorrect to difference jobs security , luokkahuoneen security or at home puuhailevan child safety between ? 
perhaps he pinches president khatami of . 
aung san suu kyi is now actually under house arrest . 
i therefore to go further trade , or would recommend trade or tend to favour the further action . 
question no 15 ( h-0769 / 00 ) : 
they requested to this , including the both electoral and non-electoral , which they were had . 
questions no 16-44 will be replied to in writing . 
we would like accounts since european report , which parliament should published and to . 
we should concentrate on the , that are to produce other than weapons , and the , how we can compete with the other asetuottajamaiden . 
security council five permanent commissioner , which task is to security , should pay attention to these proposals and to what agreement as soon as possible a system , which is really worth of the 21st century . 
the debate today is an important step in the reform process , which prodi the commission started a little more than year ago . 
i can be , that when the commission without the to proposal reform on white paper set deadline , it is concentrated enough detail . 
i therefore propose that financial controller , and that internal auditor to every year report , which to information their work . 
van hulten 's report is quite rightly to the commission clearer expression being promoted by that leave the separation and create ladies and basis exchange of good practice between institutions . 
this is not hopefully to happen again in this context . 
if we something for the institutions , so the committee of independent experts the independence must apply to the line . 
we we experienced earlier very often , how too long decision-making processes are led to application factors for the , that they are to and lost confidence in european bodies to . 
i would like to say the commissioner , that this report is only the . it means , in that it is the first stage , when we bridge the control system and a system , which we want between reform to time . 
this before the proposal concerns . 
only then , when they can to , is the introduced also otanta , valikointi , which are often . 
these are mere words ; we all aware that , that task is certainly not easy . 
i of course , it with , that we as politicians we and technology ammattilaisina cannot solve this problem at all alone . 
fortunately , however , very great majority children and young people is environment , which is not any these problems characteristics . 
i fully agree with the commission president , with the that this constitution remind list is a necessary , and me is quite clear , that the principle of subsidiarity is strengthen and that the eu is not to the policy they many areas , which political problems are not the cross-border . 
information from all over the world and all information sectors will take place very short time home , and one throughout the world is everyday life them . 
they were arrested very quickly , and they said : ' it is funny to police , sarjafilmeissä is is so easily to . 
legislator i this , mr president is not regulated , but it is all between remember , that is all its own rights and responsibilities . 
i particular attention also the arguments , which was education , to talk about equipping to read pictures , young people generations score of providing so , that they are critical of media and are not spending what any , when any and how any . 
a is not be more damaging their orastaville alter concepts that disturb than it , if this document is a must progress or if it is more mobility or if it is even put the movement of obstacles of education , which is in today . 
there the problems are different countries , for example , the different types of social security regulations , apurahoista , right of asylum and taxation are different , and oppiarvoja and -asteita recognised of . 
time is already , that europe attention again to socrates and young people of europe such as programmes proper implementation . 
experience students and teachers movement show , that movement of real master document no so much opetushallinnon , but social , tax and maahantuloviranomaisten areas . 
socrates mentioned this as example . 
we must be clear inspections , clear control , although it would otannan the , and before all a , which students can be valituksiaan . 
we demand that is why researchers in the group of people recommendations . 
it is easy to , but it is more difficult to achieve in practice . 
the debate is closed . 
we pleasant , which will president chirac and foreign minister joschka fischer by the way . 
enlargement requires in ; of again to enlargement and not undermine it . 
last few days seek to re-ignite the west bank , the violence in jerusalem and in gaza raise concern . they are sea , which is the unacceptable slowly edistyvästä of . 
the commission annual reports on motion for a resolution , which you today position , the issue varied . 
this is clearly in the finland on report , which concerns women in decision-making . finland by indicators , can be to the progress . 
commitments made at and equality at work on kollokvion , i would like to mention two important document , which is devoted to exclusively equality , but which are working and social affairs to the council . 
the second is non-discrimination principle , and this includes gender discrimination based on . 
i would like to say reports - the council president on this matter - also that the cultural differences between are of course one of the eu of problems . 
here we are discussing reports give the impression of this . 
we monitor , that is really important directive regarding equality in legislation . 
i believe , that this finland the first time tool for regenerating method is very many areas useful and the part of the commission , tasa-arvostrategiaa it is reason expect much . 
equal opportunities on behalf of the french women were eu : the law to night work , . 
the french as a citizen of this is of me completely unrealistic . 
these comments , vote for report , because we of course equal opportunities , but equal opportunities based on respect for all other before . 
if on the freedom of choice to of their own children , in will for over of youth crime and vandalism form . 
i would remind you in this context , the report which divorce , to pension rights of and which hoped , that the 1979 directive finally in provisions eloonjäävälle spouse to rewarding and eläkkeensaantiin oikeuttavasta concerning the age limit . i remember , that the 1986 ' become a watered down ' directive completed too late . 
polish women were us very grateful for that , we clear , that polish representative in fact tabled polish women position this issue . 
women stronger participation government all levels and all life areas is an essential point , so that democracy can go into and so that peace can be achieved and to . 
finally , i would like to refer to the women in the candidate countries . 
the council , especially the men , is therefore very important in this area to lead to europe in the fight against naiskauppamafiaa . responsibility feel politicians are can to this , it will shrug his shoulders to or be , this slave trade . 
today tarkastelemistamme reports and contributions we can conclude the , which many of us women already no approach to it , , that question equal opportunities is structural problem and that it is to be general strategies , because we women we not a single category or sosiaaliryhmä and nor a community . 
is true , that i was a little regret the , that maria de minister mrs belém roseira not no longer in office in this . 
two of you wanted new social rights and new verotusoikeuksia . 
thirdly , it is perusstrategian the european union , and even charter of fundamental rights important part of presented it fact , that we have description of the situation was . it to also opportunities at national level , so that member states can do comparisons national intentions for . 
the joint debate on is closed . 
these amendments is to new , , which is institutions between agreement , and that is why parliament cannot from these comitology amendments on the side , because they is been in extent of new institutions between framework . 
i itself but i still it with , that parliament recently adopted by text replied much better internal market and market emancipation retaliations and revenge that new conditions , because rejected the amendments , clarify and control to aspects of greater certainty , that the provisions apply and that the on on equal policies . 
if we want , that third countries accept agreements , the european community must be the first vartioimassa jealously guard their its own rules point ; if a country is possible smuggle products , why it community kingdom were to stand to negotiate with us kind of revenge action licences ? 
the way parliament amendment without the paperiasiakirjoja the notifications and the council is adopted it , to the , that member states by can use modern means and continue to automatisoituja hallintovälineitä . 
now is but late , because we voted just and because parliament members voted for amendment . 
vote ( continuation ) 
dybkjær , on behalf women rights and equal opportunities committee ( a5-0198 / 2000 ) the annual reports 1997 , 1998 and 1999 women and men equal opportunities the european union ( com ( 1998 ) , - c5-0106 / 1999 , com ( 1999 ) 106 - c5-0289 / 2000 , com ( 2000 ) 123 - c5-0290 / 2000 - 1999 economic and social committee ( cos ) ) 
. ( fr ) this is not the first time , when i students and teachers movement . 
this report is important in the context , that it appears the european union for critical currently on the eve of enlargement , . 
discrimination is by creating new cannot be to entities , but it can to only and alone by people opinion . 
. ( fr ) i abstained on mann report , because although must to people equal treatment , employment and work , so it is not , however , to so enthusiastically , that forgotten any rights of and respect for the rule of law . 
the form of punishment church kuulumattomana i cannot support this exception . 
scotland , national party - the snp , must welcome this directive and the objective discrimination to end in the workplace . 
so that directive is acceptable and viable , it is must is most eloquent in demanding and toiveajattelulla , which is not nothing to do sermons in legislative texts . 
the eplp is very reservations about the following points but . 
there is also some of which we believe that , should be member states to decide , as directive general implementation , training of certain ikäryhmiin in workers , välitysjärjestelmän nature and it , how small and medium-sized companies should interpreted directive . 
an interview van hulten rightly point out , that we can to positive agenda only ago , when we solved such problems than fraud , of waste and also shortcomings decision-making tuloksellisuudessa and efficiency . 
report on my vote reasons the mainly the question , the european union should be concerned i believe that nato relations , and also the of common defence policy , which is forward . 
also report on european arms exports as a , which will future local conflicts in the european . 
i cannot accept , however , that report in the common defence policy and european security and defence policy within nato . 
. ( el ) children are violence on television was the first victims . 
i very pleased this research . 
the european community level , a group of experts , which task is to general principles report , which in minors protect media the extremely negative . 
dybkjær report ( a5-0198 / 2000 ) 
. ( el ) is particularly interesting , that the political annual reports of is the first time to assessment . 
peru 
mr president , in peru is this now uncertainty time and we all wish to cultivate this , that the current the this situation will be a process , through which guarantee all civil and political rights and which to democracy and peace in and become established in peru , country which 15 : the last year in 25 000 people is received killed . 
now it is word democracy . 
. ( de ) mr president , ladies and gentlemen , in which conditions . elections took place this year in may , is to torjuttavina . 
b5-0793 / 2000 by mrs ainardi and others gue / ngl group , on behalf of the situation in afghanistan women . 
it therefore i it with , that is good , that decision contains some clear and clear points just women situation and that it is attention to , how necessary is that we help , so that we can prevent it , that taliban regime , to its full women discrimination . 
the eu is the fact in this important task . 
no member state is must recognise the taliban power so long as country is human rights insulting policy , particularly women systematic discrimination . 
we is to be this into account european institutions , as it , that huumeviljelmiä used up arms . 
however , the commission will afghanistan to neighbouring countries to , so that the opportunities to improve drugs . 
i think now is a good time to the european union , that is start to plan latin america that they have elected policies , which , to possibly to avoid it , that these countries are at times of major koettelemiksi than in some countries is been . 
. ( de ) mr president , ladies and gentlemen , the commission and parliament that the spanish jesuiittapapin by mr matos castro mention last week 's liberalisation welcome . 
b5-0782 / 2000 haarder the eldr group for macedonia the training and education have mutual benefits universities on law ; 
that is why we all very pleased that , that yliopistotasoista training the problem now finally perhaps to really good solution . 
this is i think before all good example all the neighbouring countries , that education can be through to more than their hatred , as now so often happens , and that education can also measures peaceful multinational society itself as the cradle . 
i would also have liked , that we achieved a solution , which all parliament parties would have accept . 
i may i perhaps in this context , that bring the commission experience cooperation mr max van der stoel 's with have been good . 
we not only to express here . we want to know express our sorrow , what happened , why so happened and how we can to situation , how we can we , the commission and the european parliament , this forward be help so , that such cases in future no . 
mr president , which , we agree with this common resolution . supported it , as it is , urgency , and the reasons i have just the we different with urgently the amendments . 
on amendment no contracts is there to the directive or amendment no wording is not so satisfactory than text is . 
it is simply not acceptable scotland northern and western islands for , and nor possible through the north sea and the european continent between the transport , which i hope for discernible in the near future . 
i am pleased that the greek government , is now removed this derogation . 
that is why the commission , immediately express on safety on the causes , the greek government and asked it to the report , how community law to greece . 
i would like to the this matter and ask you to in the bureau , intend that this should certain parties now , that the also thursday sittings unemployment , when friday sittings is already been . 
i would like also to say , that you the european union is taken the necessary procedures , so that we can to because currently , when people are serbia will respect , because the moment , when mr who voted of government is of the following measures : first power we immediately sanctions and secondly , we economic aid package , which can help serbia people kunnostamaan their again . 
these at belgrade streets perhaps , will be start now democratic change and start it without violence . 
condemn all acts , which can understand hatred purposes , particularly , if the deeds of jerusalem sacred places . 
we shall it is very perhaps be a symbolic hand that the through , as high representative solana said . 
it is shocking aspect in all , that israel police and army used stockpiling of more explosive bullets , which persistent negligence may ruin in and explode on and which are internationally banned even soldiers fighting between , and the was now against civilians . 
i believe , that europe can and must it to this , a much , clearly and effectively . 
we must do everything we can the tulehtuneen situation as soon as possible to resolve . 
provocative towards , as ariel sharon action , not must be . 
the same is arisen again today , and it is just to prevent and prevented europe at all in recent years as in the middle east , to which , to the united states is alone to . 
we will not do serbia people ylevien and moral tavoitteenasettelujemme victims , because it could be even thousands of people death in serbia and yugoslavia . 
mr president , finally , i would like to the proposal , that as soon as possible and immediately when yugoslavia is a new government , parliament delegation travelling on the yugoslavia to the new government with plans new serbia building . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , parliament is clear , that we are today parliament possibly historic days . totalitarian dictatorship the last pillars on which rests in europe possibly collapse now . 
mr president , german-speaking , topical things on documents i do not know , is other language versions the same lack of is a problem , that the only in gue / ngl group , but a single motion for a resolution amendments and common texts . 
mr president , i wanted to draw attention to only colleagues paperikasaan , which shows the , which we documents we voted this week in . 
if parliament could do the council decision amendments , it would be croatia unemployment and social problems , which the croatia could laihdutuskuurista , but in this context to amendments is not legal basis . 
now is just the opportunity to , that the european investment bank is on the same objectives . 
mr president , we here last night serbia and there of salute her changes . 
i would like to strongly , to the council , particularly so that they also the next year and it years the next budget on negotiations in the months as possible close to the commission proposal , which is i think still the best assessment of the total cost so croatia than other parts of the balkans . 
country was in 1990 democratic elections , which were international estimates the fair and free . 
therefore ' , ' this economic aid , ' yes ' this conditions , but the compelling requirement the commission support this encourage very european and now really democratically and the rule of law principles in controlled countries and lead to the candidate countries , it because i believe croatia commendable we fully support . 
i , the rapporteur , it will , for certainly now funds available , when it appears that , in serbia also need major capital flows and union budget is considerably increased . 
croatia national parliament and the european parliament delegations by the council to eib : the mandate . 
as kroatiankin case , i hope , that relations creation will soon and that we help serbia people , which deserves what the respect . 
( the approved ) . 
in this spirit we call on therefore the european parliament to the women this delegation the deadline for applications for will take place on tuesday and on wednesday , when the ilmoittautumiset and , delegation of pro-artist names , the it spirit , that we women between rauhansiltoja there , where violence a war is raging . 
all the basque country , and spanish have been suffer more ; spanish and basques are certainly tired of the conflict . 
mr president , you will recall , that the last part-session i question the british democracy for kampanjoivan james mawdsleyn plight , when the authorities in him illegally detained . 
mr president , i to really the rules of procedure . 
actually , this sides technical report , which is apparently to major political changes , is very important , because it is in the opportunity to genetic engineering and end up in this , geenimuunneltuun issues . 
if we now vote this report , development will recession . 
as you said , in the exists is rejected this appeal and it is informed us proper way negative its decision . 
now case conditions once and the was my colleague ppe : in , but it is been political kotikenttäni in italy . 
that is why we hope to , that to the social agenda scoreboard , which is also the internal market , and which the clear measures , deadlines and for . 
mr minister , i hope , that the council must inspiration parliament expectations and that you nice summit to ambitious objectives , which the european socio-political programme on we can ago in the years to cooperation . 
in paris on 8 july the european council informal employment and social policy on the after the asked all the european parliament , operators , of course , economic and social committee , regions committee , the social partners , ngos , the council working groups and committees - to this on proposals . 
is incorrect to the quality and to each other vastakohdiksi , and lisbon was clearly two objectives : more jobs and better jobs . 
this mobility is support for structure . 
we must try to list all the system to them and also to they and which , in the programme . 
open coordination is that the way , if we want to ensure the european social . 
the lisbon imported social efforts on the requires community efforts , action plan to create jobs in particular the information society services in . 
the commission cannot , of course , to this important contribution , but social problems are to have , and the is to so , that is carefully of practical conditions . 
social dimension to was to economic policies turmiollisimpia effects . 
the original proposal was much better without amendments to the commissioner . 
report presented programme is ambitious , and i remember still very difficult , how was to social security the matters last legislative term . 
i think it to also the women family and working life coordination . 
sometimes i feel , that ' production basis are essential ' most whatever that may mean social protection reduction . 
what are the fundamental elements of ? 
is difficult to even even european objectives , but should equally in all member states which , because situations are different . 
committee is become 49 amendments . 
together , that this amendment proposes discussion here every year parliament together with the commission . 
a second report ) the community supports a more new initiatives on the need 's assessment work . support , if necessary , also national legislation to equality and promoting and discrimination to the efforts the . 
in the past is not a good ideas or good plans to achieve equality , but the implementation is often failed . 
is abnormal , that all women speaks for a number of small , which to professionally on demands it , , that them tihkuu public funds . 
women and men is be equal , civil society , women is to be able täysimääräisistä human rights and fundamental freedoms . 
i hope , that also men will finally action and are fighting in the clichés about gender roles and stereotypes on the part against . 
i think we is now thank him for , that he is followed debate , because his presence in this debate also not been agreed . 
competition policy 
we is to our best conditions , so that they can to plan their production and in particular future . 
them must be available broad range of high-quality , securing access for competitive , and this goods is last , the reason why , single market is vigorously forward and together free competition , with because this is all our citizens interests in . 
example the decisions to do it , will kivihiiliteollisuudelle state aid or not . 
riis-jørgensen report 16 point deals with the increased legal certainty , when it is here on applications , and the more effective and faster timetables court vetoamiseksi . 
which , it is public companies , which economic strength is not correct johtamistavasta , but rather previous and the monopoliasemista . 
so that citizens knew what interests , competition policy achieve , citizens in their information is to . 
they are of regional economies and employment for particularly relevant , and i hope , that in future this is clear , so that these aid , internal aid , which the regional development and regional economy , which the example are the to , could continue . 
communication contains three the message . 
i thank sincerely also mr evans his excellent reports , which are all to state aid steel on legislation and the european union of the aid . 
so i would like assure commissioner palacio and karas and other speech these points puuttuneille parliament members , that regulation takes their concerns widely of . 
otherwise we competition and consumer helping the goal refer way . 
the debate is closed . 
rahoitusjärjestelyllä is implemented ec : the treaty article 119 , which is provision in economic and monetary union third stage in the member states only for , which are not involved yhtenäisvaluuttahankkeessa . 
. ( de ) mr president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen , i thank the , that we was today time to this proposal for a directive amendment of the council vegetative propagation material item of the trade of directive 68 / eec 193 / amending , and i hope , that proposal is adopted tomorrow vote . 
some of them are tabled on 5 july beaunen appeal , which they have a strong concerns gmos the use of the their industry . 
the rules , which these provisions contain , favour , the vegetative propagation material material and to the terveystakeet , which is very important , so that community support can be effectively requalification restructuring , which is a key issue new wine com : in . 
is say hard and clear , that is been at all necessary with this directive articles full reference to directive 90 / 220 , which is review , if ago to all efforts to promote the genetic manipulation in . 
i pleasure to you , is that we can also accept graefe zu baringdorf by amendments , which seeks to 3540 security and hallintavaatimusten the of national legislation directive 90 / 220 in . 
i would like to point out that the only , parliament is not been asked themselves to its position . 
mr president , i refer to the pöytäkirjamme 14 , which the request mr pacheco pereira parliamentary immunity of . 
i am speaking more määräenemmistöasiasta . 
the vote , i would say that two very familiar opportunity is equally in the simple weighting , which is very small majority of or double majority , which is different models , , simple or on double majority or a model of their population . 
it needs , evaluation and yugoslavia federal republic to economic and assistance coordination , which is of the european commission and that the world bank , is not no to the european council decided that , biarritz to yugoslavia federal republic first urgent humanitarian hätäapupaketin , which the 200 million is eur . 
ladies and gentlemen , parliament - but , to you freely and very sincerely diverge markedly from my , i would say that these issues , the commission and the weighting of votes difficulty , nice failure or success is cannot be measured on the basis of this . 
positive was also , that the heads of state and government adopted charter of fundamental rights , but mr president , the council is also , i remind why approval of was possible . 
we must stifle to death nice spirit , and so a priority issue is a key 50 : the remaining is of the negotiations to the political level . 
in this , i would like to address the european people 's party also to my colleagues - and i urge mr poettering to listen to me - because we must defend parliament both inside and outside it , what defend parliament . 
it on the basis of what we know , the government , and what presidents were biarritz , has shown himself capable treaty revision of the issues , charter of fundamental rights will probably nice the victory . 
the council could answer in the european citizens expectations by a peoples and national parliaments consultation , which , should possible to a real needs the charter . 
is therefore urge all to our union source , is therefore be as bold as gentlemen giscard d ' estaing and schmitt were the european parliament election by universal suffrage , directly elected in 1976 and 1979 and is to decide , that in the commission president 2009 we finally is at the same time the european union president . 
i would like this , in particular to the , what mr poettering said about small and large countries between . 
i should only a few by external trade policy , because it is very seriously be subject . 
it is valuable thing , as all participants are pointed out european council . 
the second very positive thing was that , charter of fundamental rights was adopted as a whole . 
also , i feel that this european union and the future päätösmenettelyjen for crucial important question , nowadays was important , and we can only welcome the . 
i hope , that we can still assure others , to and to this matter in nice through . 
i two practical examples : the is not been the right work and to work , and the many social rights , which the european council to social charter , is not involved charter of fundamental rights . 
throughout europe in debates , also biarritz in debates , is become clear , that the member states are aims not to dissuade small member states to the european union member states to the direction and the wishes in . 
both laitojen dissatisfaction is of the , that negotiators are going the right balance towards . 
the european leadership is not formulated clear view . 
the commission , which is to principles , which the individual countries must be represented , is not of far-reaching view . 
this union would centralist , and it would small countries less influence than the united states into a proper two-chamber system to länder . 
the el el-sheikh memorandum summit all parties involved were looking for all , way to violence and critical dialogue to restore barak and arafat between , but the after we saw , that it was extremely difficult , although moment time näyttikin it , that violence to stop . 
obviously bad applied where reporting agents set mr barón crespo untrue to say things italy and my party . 
important progress is european energy taxation , and this , is the principle of unanimity prevented . 
we must things to the point , that small countries are fear the saneluratkaisuihin . 
my opinion , the convention is done excellent work , and i proud of , that i be this convention commissioner . 
in this second question , which is , at a mediterranean tempo this large and small countries between absolutely equal system is . 
it , that qualified majority voting to real issues together with codecision , 250 article of the in form , the commission role and role closer cooperation , and only the first pillar , are , some of points , which , we can immediately to , it is after all , failure or success . 
mr president , first of all thank you , altiero jacques - for opening up spinellille and fernand herman and thank you all once havelista carlo ciampiin , joschka fischer jacques chirac , , michel barnierista , moscoviciin , chris patten costa simitisiin and the thanks official function in florence and for the european parliament existing members , which have in 1999 the european constitution on a project . 
let us should not use too much trade every europe , and this says you socialist : this europe is created prosperity all . 
let this objective , even when we and the , let , how we it . 
mr president , i have to say , that welcome the intergovernmental conference recently the proposals the essential , all or part of i criteria . 
mr president , mr commissioner , the commission ladies and rapporteurs , ladies and gentlemen , parliament you hoped , that a debate this morning the issues , which , parliament is not necessary to last april its intergovernmental conference on opinion . 
so the constitutional framework under i should difficult assume and i say that the procedure parliament advise you consultative opinion as to time more closer cooperation . the world 
as you know , that this requires us to do , of political choices which are of much greater than the requirement to the three . 
i myself stressed that the charter of fundamental rights , laatimismenetelmä was not yet been able . 
however , i was thought , that linguistic six months , your question was another concern . 
this is why i wanted just to thank you , and content that form for , for your initiative . 
closer cooperation implementation is should lead to new bodies of union institutions alongside . 
is time check the treaties . 
european council is this the european consensus in the european union charter of fundamental rights relative treaties , a the the legally binding and , to citizens , which rights is been , access to of court . 
otherwise i think is can be citizens europe . 
8 point : the address - and i quote - ' text des questions laissées ouvertes ' ( questions , which were open ) . 
no one is not yet been able to explain me , which is now changed the times . 
secondly agenda is inadequate , because it is been from union future for particularly important and citizens interesting questions . 
mr minister , history papers are , that bolsevikkien revolution - on the eve of event , which were unfortunate consequences the world - russia ortodoksikirkko was concentrated to discuss paastonajan messupukujen kuosista . 
cooperation must this , to all they guarantees , which the rapporteur is proposed , which are all open and which respect the spirit and work community legislation against . 
however , is one point , which i would like to ephremidis opinion : i is not right , that member states to calls for referendum just the changes of , or that it is even . 
we have had very essential debate two different subject , which is but a common being a genuine interface . 
we prepared to the , that this can be vote november part-session in , so that it could also accept the french presidency in . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
what means ' the to osaeläkkeelle part-time work within the framework of ' , if it is not threat , which is already eläkeiälle quite too high in country ? 
we know , that the elderly children , are to hilloista . 
i asked to pensioners , which elected me here the european parliament as a member of the pensioners ' party if they drink genetically modified wine . 
exceptionally , can offer lisäysaineistolle standard , when needs is cannot be covers other categories . 
mr president , so i ask you : are also on the issue of fluctuations these reasons not free competition restrictive the european union factor ? 
so our voice could be only against , so as it was . 
, to towards greater regulation the european union dismantling , state aid can still be but constructive social and economic development . 
this support can be necessary to protect the environment , public services to and equal income to guarantee economically weak regions people . 
we it risk , that significant state of the eu : the control of the eu , after the into consideration will also lower level aid as a competition smes . 
section vi , economic and social committee 
when considers the categories 2 , 3 , 4 and 7 of the erääntymissuunnitelmia , finds , that payments cover only average 8 % of all obligations . 
we työllisyysaloitteemme three years ago in a smes to risk capital . 
parliament wants to support two way . 
only then the european union institutions are up informed . 
in this context i would like to thank constructive cooperation in particular for the vice-president , mr gerhard schmid . 
we want , that this committee to effectiveness , but we cannot allow , that there are least the european parliament demands as budgetary authority . 
it means it , that the 2001 budget is the last total annual budget , and it is also the commission proposal background and parliament considering the proposal . 
also we want to administrative expenditure . 
parliament is the committee on budgets since 1985 , - really since 1985 - tried the , that the european parliament procedures to the parliament resolutions adopted by rahoitusvaikutus . 
mr president , i thank finally other institutions common statement for reading . 
you are statement today position , which is budget already been the council at first reading . 
structural measures : structural measures for the same remain as the 2000 budget . 
the council is revision of the financial perspective calmly . 
when we compare these three institutions different figures , we see , that they is still considerable differences , purely of , and of course more significant - . 
i refer to is that the council , the made last year long of debate after new decision on comitology , and the debate opening is little hope . 
berlin to 2006 something across financial perspective of was for ifo , billion eur . 
i would ask the council and the committee on budgets that parliament think things budjettipoliittisen perspective , also foreign policy , then , when they are dealing with foreign policy . 
the second concerns aid of victims , which need special treatment kuntoutuskeskuksissa . 
if now remaining time in to a compromise , which supports economic and monetary affairs committee work , we can to regulate this , otherwise we open our committee position . 
we not need to than television , so we see the difficulties in the middle east and which we reminder of the day . 
that is why i hope , that we vote tomorrow but enough dublin the majority position . 
mr president , i would like to a few comments on behalf of the committee on agriculture and to the sound rural policy . 
we asked , that common fisheries policy on the information campaign to two million euro reference ceilings are appropriations . 
the commission must to negotiations important arguments , so that morocco with to a sensible agreement , and the council and the governments to is to these negotiations politically . 
we today the 2001 budget , images in mind . 
we all , , that these amendments were adopted . 
one important ways , which citizens can to ensure that , in their deals with , is to either ombudsman or parliament . 
i am speaking first parliament budget . 
many our delegation commissioner people 's surprise , we september at the beginning of unanimously a ydinstrategian , and some 400 amendments tabled by my colleagues were surprise many of us the committee on budgets . 
is difficult to see how new posts , a solve hallinto-ongelman , if programmes but is vanhentunein and mutkikkain policies and the commission that the council . 
parliament is shown last years many times , that it to work on real apply thrift as well . 
so is must do , that speaks for years löyhäsuisesti commitments and will always the , but ago when is it payments , says that now this goes too far , we now is to make cuts expenditure . 
we have hopes here by a few millions of much more it is can be these budget lines , and when these people really need money , we they again from . 
the 2001 budget is the last year , the contradictory pressure , which is almost impossible to , namely the pressure stabilisation and säästöpolitiikkaan , as agreed between the institutions enlargement to ensure , and funding on the other hand the balkans to the stability pact . 
demand better performance means also call for more staff . 
if amendment should adopted its original form , we have to appropriations of , but the committee on budgets majority rejected this idea . 
this is unfortunately much examples : always special treatment , which is an unfettered federalist approach promoting organisations or many ngos , which philosophy and action are very questionable , european political parties to until , prince programme hukutettuja sums of money member states citizens to reassure euro benefits currently , when european always danish from the european central bank held until question on the european currency . 
finally , mr heaton-harris quite rightly referred to what the european union many programmes unilateralism . they are citizens usual propaganda speeches story european integration , and all citizens , kustantamana . 
our administrative systems is also reform . we is move a good example . 
strategically very important geographical area , the mediterranean , development been meda is a good example täytäntöönpanovalmiuksien lack of . 
do not forget , that parliament is its own priorities , when of business to or money finding category 4 certain priorities to finance . we did the clear the vote . 
chapter is therefore to . 
thank you very much , mr wynn . 
it means only flexibility , which , in certain policies can forward , even when all are to cannot or not it do not want , and it , which the union member states , the candidate countries also . 
i think austria is not to complain about in , on the contrary . 
regional organisations recommendations and neighbouring countries experience can to help these means in . 
0.2 % colombia landowners in a 32 % country in 1984 . 
the council is comment on this very delicate and painfully question different aspects . 
but extremely complex issues is to be debate about only . 
question no 10 ( h-0722 / 00 ) : 
i therefore do not want to no final answer this difficult question . 
we is only a feeling , which your answer to some extent , the council presidency supports that is not very willing to this issue . 
this tax on is therefore , of course , will be non-existent . 
i i apologise , but this rules of procedure . 
the reason , which , on the right here of is been silent , therefore , that it is we we these things already again explained , and we believe that the same issues is not many time to here chamber and to we precious time . 
also , the when we of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies prevention on the directive , is in june 2000 these diseases , adopted decision risk that the material , to to prevent the outbreak and new guarantee consumers as possible good protection . 
i is not other information than they , which i you already given . 
we are the commission and the council work erika 1 package on and know the very . but this & # x02bc ; in , which both countries and the european union , which is very feel a large ships and which use to a few hours only , and when takes into account , that there is risk , that old cans etc. which existed haaksirikkoutuvat there and are disaster , i would have liked to know - and especially also and sardinia people want to know - whether possible simply to these the , the in the rahtilaivoilta , the bonifacion the through and are you in this ban . 
it is why we must support the commission proposals in principle i think personnel policy of . 
budget is serbia and kosovo for new fresh money . 
mr president , i hope that we can , finally , however , to cut 50 million eur budget line , which is israel and plo : the peace negotiations . 
so the european parliament proposes new measures , which is so much to seek new funding - which is under present circumstances cannot be to , as already know - but to new institutions between commitments , which improve expenditure quality and ensure , that one euro to wasted . 
think of it , that european policy , as where any , , moderates options are sometimes not majority alternatives . 
it is designed rather than manages to complicate further to clarify , and i was disappointed to activity-based budgeting the attitude , which today is the . 
the expenditure activities , may lead to the , however , that budget is seen as a political instrument , which expenditure distribution of reflects clear political priorities . 
find the solution , so that we also next in and the next item happen in this debate it , how find money balkans reconstruction . 
sustainable development in the agricultural sector interested know , that recent in berlin adopted reform of the was to production support for directly income support farmers . 
ladies and gentlemen , budget is , however , always more than mere numbers . 
finally , mr president , is also immoral to cut expenditure agricultural policy , the meda programme and social exclusion , to guarantee funds on the eu 's financial obligations in kosovo and yugoslavia . 
the people are simply serbia must palella and to see hunger this winter . 
on the other hand i would like to express my concern , that the different conceivable options range from is included in the . 
the council is of course say clearly , that is also responsible for many external action of the lack of programmes . 
now we need a solution these subsidies and even greater extent the region on the necessary , the long-term plan . 
i think , that most are prepared to accept the provided , that money to right . 
i agree with the rapporteur rühle with the concerns and explanatory statement , which he mentioned today research and forms of social assistance in the categories . 
two weeks ago we was eu-akt : the parliamentary assembly . 
also , we want that at the same time to community funds research and information for the tobacco growers alternative types of farming to . 
i would like to clear the european union , that northern ireland effects have been so direct and positive than can only imagine . 
in this model rules and procedures to ensure compliance with independent supervisory body and last ultimately judges . 
this to the first time at first reading codecision text , which is a very full of and technical difficulties and which the sector , which is personal freedoms protection for particularly sensitive . 
is very positive , that their its is not combined . 
is generally known , for example , that is , about whether a more than 10 million of almost 1.5 million citizens , that europol competence is constantly , that it brings 15 member states police authorities respective information and that it is only one authority , which is not competence or resources , which it need to carry out its work . 
this , on the commissioner presence opportunity and i say , that i should appropriate to address new technologies of citizens protection , but this also also these technologies introduced , so that could be to the european citizens ability to the european institutions and the be interaction with the . 
amendments 1 , 2 , 4-10 , nos 12 to 40 , 42-54 , 57 , 58 and 60-64 reiterates the council text the points the , which the commission cannot accept . 
this is clear , that the opinion personal data protection on legislative proposals will be very valuable , because it is important contribution to the discussions between institutions legislation . 
the treaty is recognised , that outermost regions economic and social situation is difficult , and it are erityishaitat , which lasting effects of and make combined effects to these regions development . 
it would therefore economic and social progress high employment through . 
i therefore congratulate the rapporteur to , and we very forward the commission proposals legislative development , so that characteristics could soon to the amsterdam treaty article 299 ( 2 ) the in . 
many european some outermost regions are a matkakohde the . 
our regions plummeting while unemployment rises are union highest . 
i am pleased that the committee , adopted a majority amendments , which i was proposed . 
i think is very important , that outermost regions into the european trans-european transport , energy and telekommunikaatioverkkoihin . 
it , that regional policy committee adopted unanimously by margie sudre 's report presented by the european parliament , is of a as its commitments to the most important . 
we can discuss of circumstances and imagine , that when that get the ideal and idyllic version set out - let us it so - situation is reached , these three area and particularly today before us outermost regions is no longer need for other measures . 
this article is certainly possible all , ladies and gentlemen women and , but it to our the - and this is necessary - and i think of improving . 
the proposals in the commission is , of course , cooperation and the regions with member states . 
we know , that these areas is permanent difficulties , and i believe objectively , when takes account of the real growth rate , that they will need permanently regional policy support and specific measures . 
a meeting to to the year 2001 , when in march the proposed programme is the been to . 
president declared the end of the discussion , and i accept it fully . 
i think parliament is good to to the rules , because , as a another mr said , very often is indeed so , that fact that a machine , but are members forget vote , and if the vote to this , new , we should never by the end of the vote . 
i clearly it , what do . 
mr commissioner , the commission is also authority really necessary , that the commission competent services create cooperation and coordination with member states a and effective monitoring system the food chain and that the european union elintarvikelaboratorioiden network and that it is develop coordinated with the commission . 
is avoid double work and scientific research , we need therefore cooperation and national research centres community research centres with . 
we are discussing today white paper , and we is reason to some important principles . 
those procedures is now been , and in our country is a food agency . 
finally , the support , some new amendments , in particular amendments nos 11 to 13 , and 7 to 9 from and we would like free vote amendment no 14 . 
this against background i would like to say first , to guarantee that food safety depends on government by strict control , which is as strong as it part of the . 
we are discussing issue , which is clearly , how do justice and abstained is the debate , which is the european political integration . 
therefore the european food safety authority believe the only scientific tests , so that it is the national elintarvikevirastoihimme . 
if in the in europe today in the nutrients diseases , the see , that the part of the first was again america . 
however , conditions , which under authority can , is to be so , that they not authority fast and effective measures to . 
we should also remind the , as that some me by speakers , in particular mr whitehead and mr gebhardt , already the white paper is much more than just one new union binding regulatory corpus . 
mr president , i am pleased today and i am grateful to the commission , because and it is started better food safety on work , that the rapporteur and the committee on the environment bowisille , public health and consumer policy committee . 
i particularly important amendment no 17 . this amendment says , that consumer organisations is be consulted . 
secondly , food labelling the rules must change balanced and tukkumyyntiä that trade for therefore , that products and the ingredients traceability for labelling offer finally sound information consumers and give to define , to whom responsibility is possible or can be made available in . 
a new legislation is i think not good reaction the legislation should non-compliance . 
on the environment , public health and consumer policy in the vote , we managed to a balance , when annexed to the food on problems and some important references to small and medium-sized companies in different elintarviketottumusten in . 
mr president , i would like other colleagues , to congratulate the rapporteur bowis very constructive and consistent approach this problem . 
mr president , it , and white paper that food safety is not legislative importance , is in any case reduce it double value , which because without other is . 
the rapporteur , and also very many members in parliament , which in one , i have concentrated on safety and it is really regrettable . 
independence and the independence serve best european consumer role . 
this process , i often thought , that we have been fortunate report by the choice . 
mr president , i too i would like to congratulate mr bowis significant efforts to include report all views , and before all the , that he agreed to more general also food importance . 
after all , mr president , finally , political decision-makers are must avoid responsibility . 
the most important is that , the other agencies should respect it , citizens should count on the member states and governments should be willing to accept the conclusions . 
this is i view the food authority , which we need in future . 
is the world health organisation in geneva . 
i will either , that when white paper published , i authority of . 
we must therefore to ensure , that the european union to highest possible food safety standards , but this approach which supports unanimously must also to analyse the economic consequences , which it is profitability , activities concerned sectors . 
the authority are ago the following : independent scientific research , the to , independent control and inspection , rapid alert , but also coordination to restore confidence . 
i can say in passing those speakers , which require local erikoisherkkujen and perinneruokien promoting , that this issue on hygienialainsäädännössä . 
this is the commission easier to balanced proposal , which is as possible very of parliament and all concerned the food safety . 
on the contrary last years in this ongelmakimppu is acted as the driving force , which political , led to the ottawa the signature . 
i can confirm negative position amendments 10 and 19 the coherence , amendment no 29 , and i split vote point , so that the text to be better , because it is i think suffered some interpretation of into some extraordinary stew . 
this is it the first point : the european union , and particularly the commission , is to everything , so that they countries , which are not signed the ottawa convention , do it . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , we know all , what consequences landmines use is , although in some cases often suggests report sounding military arguments . 
just parliament took in 1996 first again the horizontal budget line and proper legal basis , so that we should all used as a basis in this important area . 
i can still to this fact : union ability to this objective to without other it , that some member states is still difficult to sign and ratify the . 
to against measures are most effective , when they tailored each situation . 
parliament knows , that the is already quite now too much , and parliament knows , that we also ec : the external aid uudistamisehdotusten , of individual projects to a of and focus on member states in discussions with kokonaisstrategioihin and programmes . 
ngos is a than schemes proliferating , but still about four years in geneva the the united nations first maamiinakonferenssin , and over year the ottawa the entry into force , we must , to that many countries and thousands of people in general in the poorest areas - the world - are still anti-personnel landmines and räjähtämättömistä munitions . 
the commission must improve quality programmes and speed up the implementation . 
i but it with , that if you read yet again , amendments you can see , that the of is some of which you mentioned , which i think it is , tiedostamiskampanjoista , transparency , ngos access to areas , issues , which are in this currently very but which could be more effectively to . 
the rapporteur bonino and the commission commissioner patten are right , that parliament also it and the council is not interfere in administration , and i listened carefully the commission commissioner patten this issue the attention , because he was clearly it with , that we really is not to interfere in . 
mr president , our group is been already the active in all the criteria and measures , which must be and which are production adjournment of top contributor , destruction of , the trade , miinakenttien of compensation , vahingoittuneille awareness and to . 
member states is ago support this process international contexts . 
mines are of course a obstacle countries reconstruction and it , that refugees can return to their . 
the current , it would take - as is earlier been said - much more than 100 years the earth anti-personnel landmines . 
the third of i concrete action , which the proposals we should do and which we should check and to . 
every child , which really bailing out remembers the german mine from the early death from overwork or kauheilta vammoilta in bosnia , in africa or elsewhere , is all our efforts worth . 
is indeed the european union to the member states , as finland , which are not signed agreement , or the , as greece , which are not ratified it . 
ladies and gentlemen , look at finland . 
finally , we hope , that the european common troops future tasks is technical training , in particular , of which is residence in interest to in . 
they not nor does not , that countries , which is the most mines are mainly developing countries , . 
parliament proposals are could be more contrary to the lisbon objectives with . 
mr van lancker wants , that parliament is decision , which the commission proposal to mainly therefore , that the on the other hand to many of regions , which legislation can be applied , and on the other hand will be a number of the european level rights . 
report says , for example , that the luxembourg procedure , which is employment policy , should also to social protection and social exclusion . 
germany , france , the british and in extent the italian such as the member states are all agree with the european union membership of small eastern or southern countries under the rule of oppression . 
we , as the legal reasons , that charter of fundamental rights refers to already now treaty article 6 , because charter of fundamental rights is in the convention could not do official decision it structure , and because it is therefore not legally sustainable . 
new text in the treaties would probably legal confusion . 
the rapporteur also repeat in brussels fashionable the new theory , the european union which is the double legitimacy : it , which is the european parliament from edustamilta citizens , and it , which is from the council edustamilta member states . 
. ( da ) the danish and swedish social democrats have today voted against it oliver duhamel report , which deals with the constitution of the treaties . 
therefore is that the european union crucial , is itself constitution , which is charter of fundamental rights . 
constitution should sense only if , it should real european federal , the united states , the european democratic framework . 
he said us they , as a part of politicians , that context our relations with other countries to the international through . 
. ( i ) i duhamel report interesting and constructive contribution idea , which the treaties the constitution to . 
we have with it , that if the treaties to the and the simplified , citizens should easier to understand the eu 's tasks dimension - and the borders - and procedures these tasks to . 
europe was the amsterdam treaty 1997 agreement until the supranational eturyhmittymä . 
. ( da ) edd group gil-robles gil-delgado vote against the report , which is closer cooperation . 
report expresses namely of quite too a union , which all forms of cooperation should be a institutional within and which they should all be towards supranational state objective . 
is therefore avoid it , that all the economy , and is therefore allow some member states to go forward by developing closer cooperation forms of system . 
the internal market toimintarakenteet have been the 1990s , the success . 
. ( nl ) european cooperation can be useful of cross-border problems to resolve . 
these regions could be a of sustainable development in . 
the european technocrats and judges wanted therefore to meriverojärjestelmän , which is overseas these overseas departments in kuntiemme source of income and which before all the käsityöläisiämme . 
the , france is overseas regions india in and the caribbean . 
it independence is necessary its credibility . 
our vote so far as the european food authority and the future , but it also composition stated our demands the funding and independence . 
secondly , the european food safety authority is be completely independent . 
is necessary to the agricultural and maatalouselintarviketeollisuuden practices , elintarvikehyödykkeiden imports the problems , come forward with a content composition of , dioxins and tuholaismyrkkyjäänteiden at present fixing permissible and food and other additives , and to priority food safety . 
we voted for amendment no 15 , because we very important to protect the european cultural heritage , which is local food production . 
we is not just margins in category . 
it , we would like now also shows 50 % of the budget line and to others 50 % reserve . 
i can say this , that the proposals by is been . 
haug by the committee on budgets report ( parliament adopted the legislative / 2000 ) the european parliament resolution the european court of the budget for 2001 : section iii - the commission ( c5-0300 / 2000 - 1999 / 2190 ( bud ) ) 
mr president , my name is in many countries of this report amendments . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
real surprise in this budget is external action , which is selfishness and saituus . 
money can to also by the joustavuusväline . 
. ( el ) i voted haug report and , i voted against the proposal for my group , that budget for 2001 were rejected . 
we particularly new a pilot project action , which is stimulate sexual exploitation of children to combat . 
this if which shows how little , this european project drives even politically active citizens . 
in this way 2030 % market should once open private competition . 
because this is not a before the report , i voted against report . 
if unacceptable low national thresholds , which give more aid , the proposed the market phasing-out needs of reducing 5 % citrus , 8.5 % , omenien and pears , and 10 % , trade in fruit and vihannestuotannon , , clear , that will is is no way to of very great fruit and vihannesjalostemääristä , which , all prices fall , products rot and the tuottajayhteenliittymien pakkaamoihin , and farmers is to repackage these houses and fields . 
. ( pt ) i voted for this report , because it is portuguese fruit and hedelmäalan organisations hopes . they are called for the fruit and vegetables on common organisation of the market , because the revision of the national interests the seriously . 
mr johan van hecke 's report ( a5-0296 / 2000 ) 
the problem is it , that all , the environment even and the quality , is being wealth sources and reserves capitalist exploitation and voitonpyynnin of . 
the kyoto protocol was the , that rich countries are ilmansa in it , although they would be limited to tulosluetteloihinsa emissions , which they are helped to reduce elsewhere . 
. ( fr ) the greenhouse effect is the fight against industrialized countries very important task , it is particularly to the third world peoples to , which already pay with their lives for global warming climate consequences . 
the sensible these risks and difference is life knowledge . 
also is support the to carefully endocrine disrupters - suspected perhaps also legislation through . 
consumers and smes are not enough internal market , which is been completed , the introduction of the euro . 
the fact member states are this until obliging banks to keskuspankilleen over 12 500 euro of cross-border payments maksutasetilastoita for . 
of course these companies are the same strict safety requirements and money laundering , . 
we know even cases , which transfers costs cross-border payments are increased euro of after , and it not only small amounts . 
the european central bank could help , namely by payments introduced a european tiedostomuodon and by a european clearingkoodin the international iban-järjestelmän the . 
is essential important , that consumers accept the euro . 
mr president , mr peijs report , which concerns small payments in the internal market , the old the european parliament requirement , which is cross-border transfers of costs in . 
this says peijs report motion for a resolution d ) : cross-border payments the payments damage consumer confidence eur the . 
we therefore is still much to this area , but it politicians resources and means , what we can do , are lower than what we can do this payments sisämarkkina-asialle . 
euromarkkinoita is also in future sisämarkkinoina , and citizen understand , that this area , which are the valuuttariskit and electronic about means of payment will internet-pankkien , still more itself clear , transfer germany munich austria salzburgiin is considerably more than germany within to transfer munich languages . 
these objectives implementation requires us and also you to years work . 
it , we also cross-border transfers of reducing , which peijs report calls for . 
the debate is closed . 
which , good policy seems to it , that is rather priority practice and on an aware of , which company is at the centre , and a system proposal , which is to be brought to avoid pretext and which would only precise statistics , which should in practice impossible to fully . 
i is however , three comments in this programme . 
let us not forget , that the first this sector community action programme was adopted in 1983 , , 17 years ago . 
i also always supported it , that this would be based on effective and practical policy . 
i would say , that they are the economic and innovation kommandoja , they are the front line and very vulnerable to this sector typical risks . 
we must to of the science and management on the results , which was in brussels last week in seville a technology sector forecasts to institute , , , as this meeting , because they monitoring is several common today reflected issues . 
the rapporteur mentions some priorities the european business climate to improve . 
it is excellent , because the european for aid can be to asiasisällöllisesti right , competently and quickly . 
mr president , i too i would like to thank the rapporteur for , montfortia his excellent work . 
' is important to find the right balance and to avoid it situation , that people fail constantly at the expense of others . 
this is not right , and that is why i support this report . 
this is also small businesses on charter idea . 
programme is so , that networks offer these information . 
is clear , that the basic objective of the european union action plan is countries to immigration restraint and union in illegally of their to . 
i particularly the need measures to improve the internal security , european and albania local authorities the dialogue to support the commission and the council and the need for action concrete measures to promote cooperation albania , italy and greece authorities with . 
lack of social , economic and political conditions with total absence or inadequate for and organised crime will massive emigration . 
mr president , in other than mr pack , i itself it with , that is the better , what is more group for albania . 
the problem is cannot of course , but to immediately in the short term it is a world of , which there is a right and safety and which offers opportunities for the future . 
also the people and the support donors , we all , the european and the united states , which give money and to projects , between is gap . 
we is therefore use bilateral agreements , which legally and clearly define work , oleskeluajan , oleskelupaikan , pay , working hours , working conditions and social security , to immigrants could be seen as a resource , which would our countries economy and friendship and cooperation between peoples nationalist aspirations of kylmänsodan instead . 
the very people be integrated . 
priority must not be it , how immigration and pakolaistulvaa restricted , but how can the conditions to improve therefore , that people can remain homes . 
mr president , i also i to , which my colleague dimitrakopoulos said so , that the central albania in , whether they economic , social and internal security on , is help this country to the rule of law , to guarantee citizens safety and to institutions and local authorities . 
i mr liese , it with , that we need asylum and refugee policy on common interest ; hence . 
albania and its programme for the action plan approved in june this year , and it is therefore in the sixth . 
among citizens is then this frustration but also vieraantuneisuutta european legislation to , and we would like to , ourselves , so also other community bodies , be vieroksumatta in this respect detailed work for the , to work precisely and to this for the also the necessary for and the necessary labour . 
we want to send this report citizens message , that we seriously the demands lack of quality and the complaints ylikansallistumista and concentration on complaints . 
this is of course quite important subject , although so is next , could in this plenary to say , when the how little members here is here to discuss the still . 
also - and this is important - report on subsidiarity , which is parliament this evening very controversial subject . 
should also very interesting to the commission this principle on the legislation , so that a legislation to do simpler , more transparent , more effective and then by additional legislation , as report 6 ) is . 
safety report very seriously , i came to result , that it not even political principle : it is theological principle . 
the principle of subsidiarity recognition guarantee therefore also smaller of , the services , indirect levels , social levels , families and citizens , which are the only for real objective legislative and administrative in . 
i would like therefore to a summary . 
mr commissioner , you is the commission the floor . 
we should choose this area detailed regulation , which is certainly implemented throughout , or should we consider alternatively , voluntary agreement , which , however , to be implemented and which could be to ? 
. ( de ) i voted report for , although i fail to receive a through a few amendments , because the report also calculation and we the too high costs in the euro zone . 
when 15 months after the same coins and notes is also to the 11 member states , the money is a more expensive outside the country of residence . 
mr president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen , i begin by apologising , is that fishing for the commission commissioner fischler cannot be here present today . 
the is promote fisheries cooperation and morocco , but the fisheries sector is also satisfy fully european fishing fleets the interests . 
we therefore reached agreement , that the work responsible partnership spirit , and this after morocco to views meeting , which is , as you , in brussels on 30 october , on monday . 
i was a few weeks ago the spanish south coast in tangier . it is in close to morocco . 
later time seemed , that difficult , they could be also impossible . 
fisheries agreements under union cannot to fishing and to third countries with fishing rights . 
i read a swedish fishing on ammattilehdestä , how one of those ships to catch fish el aaiúniin , which describes the marokkolainen port . 
all this is test . morocco is only with been , but all our fisheries agreements because the is , for example , been mauritania and soon also guinea with the question now . 
took 11 months to the turning point , which we now , and in this respect , we can also appreciates the commission commissioner fischler latest measures , which are his morocco on 26 october the sea and the level meetings even itself with the result . 
i would like , however , the commission to which the commission , mr busquin today represents a brave decision of a few very short , message . 
the commission question is this : if agreement with morocco is to time , or if that agreement are the commission reservations on the part conditions , , it will moroccan extraction , who production for agreement , will the commission to take structural measures to the regression , which will suffer to which areas ? 
quite as kuvittelimmekin , negotiations with morocco authorities is been very great difficulties . 
finally , the provided in the unfortunate case , that negotiations fail , union is political and moral duty to support owners and fishermen , which guarantee industry to . 
the eu is to reduce the fishing industry over-capacity . 
we therefore need quickly as possible close economic and political relations morocco ajaen the european fisheries of interests . 
this is why the commission working on a new basis partnership , which is both parties which development , and which is the morocco fisheries , fleet , aquaculture , colleges of research and development of a comprehensive and the fishing opportunities to european fishermen . 
foreign languages assistants rights 
' this is not clear difference exclusively in germany . 
in july 1999 , the commission took this infringement proceedings of the court of justice to . 
if so systems is one buying - what we hope - the principle of subsidiarity compliance with this is currently allow it , that promote discrimination , something a , which probably much is it to to privilege . 
we can perhaps to , that the previous santer the commission is the best possible , the commission been so it was to resign . 
all union member states and all parties represent the committee on legal affairs and the internal market members are met here to saying , that is unnecessary to rights and to defend needed charters , then , when if people denied their rights , effective action taken these rights recognise and inspections , monitoring frequency , and this is just the problem in this case . 
this is in any way cannot be accept in europe today . 
the education sector is of course still subsidiarity , but the agreements the free movement of workers and discrimination are us all , although we - and i particularly , because i come from very federatiivisesta country - the european union are the principle of subsidiarity cooperation järjestysperiaatteena and we the , that toimivaltajaot different levels between in europe will take place as soon as possible in the principle of subsidiarity . 
this is why it is can be no longer discrimination . 
the you to yourself , mr president , someone a , which is excellent kirurgiset terms in italian , in english , french or german , or kirurgin ? 
( the sitting was closed at 10.56. ) 
we them to deep sympathy . 
i speak now mr delude ourselves , which speaks on behalf of the socialist group and as rapporteur . 
the council is announced the third asia and the european council and the commission meeting on statements , that it not so far to statement subject . 
so this issue is treaties and the euratom treaty under the competence ; it is or can to many citizens and only the spanish citizens , because in that area , the spanish aurinkorannikolla - which is not no contingency plan for hundreds of thousands of european citizens - is union 15 member states the many people , which will , there union from outside . 
mr president , is sad but revealing to hear the spanish interior minister affair and mr oreja , say that basque nationalist with is unnecessary to discuss , although in future the a new cease-fire . 
i would ask , that this week the commission if we statement , which concerns the uk government the decision to introduce ei-brittiläisiä freight drivers discriminatory tax . 
because so so-called liberaalipuolueet , also european , are still more coalition xenophobia , racism and authoritarianism was warmongering forces with , i this is not only a risk italy but it is something , which concerns the europe . 
report but also for the french proposal . 
these requests is the karamanou report amendments 2 and 4 . 
today 's reading the french presidency is , the initiative to is to improve both the matter in criminal matters to mutual legal assistance in particular in the fight against money laundering on conventions . 
i can say to the fight against money laundering , if that is the council , it is and parliament reason . 
we can only be grateful them this work . 
as mr marinho says - and i myself agree with the way - is , of course , the community framework in . 
all , which are spoken here , have been as with the , that it is very useful initiative , and we support the message . 
we must give europol jurisdiction to countries borders over . 
a happens quite too much today 's europe , and before than i am to support a säntäämistä judgements mutual recognition , i would like , that all recognise fair core standards . 
i understand , that this is very difficult , because we in this move is of fragmented instruments basis . 
this objective of the european union is also necessary to strengthen economic area , what also citizens want . a responsibility to them , and we we actions the european union citizens is right to safety . 
we the european union is continue sisukasta fight against money laundering and be , in particular , that the single market creation and capital markets and financial services liberalisation , member states is to real police and oikeusyhteistyöhön , which is effective as possible be . 
a is justify otaksumaan , that rahoitusneuvojana a lawyer to conduct their profession . 
i would like also to my aware of the how sensitive , is several members by the question , which lawyer confidentiality conditions could be argument to combat money laundering oikeusyhteistyöstä . 
this applies particularly serious , carried out gross violations of cross-border crimes and . 
all , do is so broad and important , that the council be able to the alone . 
this need and the following to civil rights effective instrument , that the european court of recognises the need powers in particular what will the tulkintaoikeuteen and powers to or be without decisions . 
this , although i support , cooperation and coordination , so the legal system of should i think mistake , and i am it . 
the second point is also interesting . 
it is positive , and it is therefore gratifying , that parliament supports this idea so strongly . 
because many members have taken the very difficult questions , i now take this opportunity to say you fully honestly , as also mr coelho made time ago , that this initiative is that the first initiative , which shows the council political will to to it distance , which to legal cooperation . police cooperation 
that is why i think it is also important instrument to guarantee europol judicial control . 
fair-ohjelma , which was fishing , agriculture and agri-foodstuff sectors for research , was part of fourth framework programme , which was in recent years 19941998 . 
when the , how great importance tutkimusohjelmalla is agriculture and fishing , is embarrassing , that research programme administration is been problems . 
the court of auditors report fair-ohjelmasta , which the rapporteur report based on , will be published in march this year only , although audit on sektorikirjeet to the commission in december 1998 and in february 1999 . 
i would like to stress a few points on behalf of the committee on fisheries . 
i grateful that you have stressed , the people , which the report in there was the court of auditors and the commission services between dialogue , which you have own contribution . 
this proves that the commission , not been on and that it is your remarks . 
i am speaking to mr morgan the resources to pass . 
thank you very much , mr the commissioner . 
prize to of thirty-nine-year-old ya -yhdistykselle december part-session . 
i very convinced , that the charter of fundamental rights means , although the many and hallituksenpäämiehet are do not want it to , also this parliament so often and so the by a constitutional process to . 
i very pleased , that brings me today to discuss with the european union charter of fundamental rights of fine proposal , as you before parliament final opinion this text . 
i have no doubt at all , in that it should take . 
however , is true , that the charter of fundamental rights content is in a of criticism . 
this is i think important position , and i welcome the . 
we parliament we achieved a success , when - and this , political groups , which is considered as a positive result , we clearly unable to make through the , that the european parliament was represented 16 commissioner in this charter of fundamental rights in the convention . 
before the charter is i think very successful work , and it can be , as one great european newspaper the appointed on 26 september 2000 , the european visiting card . 
my group is still with it , that the treaty 6 to article 2 is quite absolutely include reference to charter of fundamental rights . 
many hoped , that europe should finally the to just a free trade and for a liberal the citizens of the european basis . 
in december in nice european council in civil society is decided mobilisoitua to make its voice heard and to desire charter of fundamental rights , which guarantees the european citizens real guarantees . 
this is why is important , that signatures , all countries and all political forces will concrete political measures days in future , which day . 
itketään therefore or is welcome , reality this great event , which is all , a empty event . 
the convention is done excellent work . 
the the human rights and civil rights , but also social rights . 
one of the most important progress is right good administration , which mr malmströmkin spoke . 
i not yet heard of them , so i am sure , not yet how far prime minister blair dogs talutushihnaa löysätään , so that could be to this excellent project for . 
mentioned the used for , which is half empty or half full . 
but cologne european council , which made excellent confusion on every continent , the convention was finally all forget , that this issue is national parliaments competence and that these power is but current trends seem gradually . 
fundamental rights excessive protection is as harmful as lack of protection . 
when will some members speeches , see , that we need more information than never . 
a question , which now to us , is charter of fundamental rights to . 
we have this , once again disappointed and dissatisfied . vote , charter of fundamental rights for , but ache . the re-opening , this is that must time the enthusiasm and participation in europe do not want citizens among , and as usual governments some governments others more are historic responsibility this position . 
co-rapporteur duff , this is important step towards the european union integration improving quality . 
i commend , that they , which , it is necessary , read sitting 49 explanations and are also to both courts in , which is the charter of fundamental rights . 
mr president , i long been epäilijöihin . 
the first time the european union after this is the basis for supranational structure , constitution as union is . 
a supports social and democratic europe , citizens europe . 
perusoikeuskirjaluonnos can so far to interesting keskusteluasiakirjana parties , trade unions , environmental organisations , churches and many other delegations in the candidate countries union member states and , when the european peoples future cooperation . 
i would like to highlight three points , which my colleague have already discussed this morning . 
charter of fundamental rights , which today we are accept , and to clarify that the common fundamental rights and values forming europe 's , which is be our community basis . 
i naturally want to , which the 6 to article charter of fundamental rights and to the later treaties . 
we already have seen bernard share my concern about the court of first instance , which the first prevented his critical of the commission on its . 
this summary is important now , when union must define rights and obligations in the third countries citizens legal role the european union , which are legally . 
i itself his way fully convinced that , that will be because direct effects and that it will still binding . 
i have heard in this debate some words : charter of fundamental rights is sharp so-called dog luuksi - the european parliament is and a - or suojapeite kituliaan the french presidency excuse , particularly igc : the management . 
this is why the european parliament is proposed , that the european and turkey between a forum , which are currently one turkish society qualified representatives and this mandate of european parliamentarians to the questions of this . 
consensus is not it , that we all we welcome democracy in turkey and turkey , respect human rights ; we we not . 
i know , , that turkey 's is still much questions . 
presidency hopes , that proposal is adopted quickly , if possible , so already 20 november , when the next general affairs meets the council , and , as i said already , respect for the very precise in helsinki decisions . 
must , however , true , what the commission is said edistyskertomuksessaan very clearly , that turkey is all other candidate countries , meet the copenhagen criteria accession process in . 
president sezar said turkey parliament last month of speech very clearly , why turkey themselves is not no alternative this uudistuskurssille . 
thank you for your attention . 
also it was there a few positive messages to put it mildly . 
we are companies , which some are quite suspicious , to report achieved managed balance . we are particularly the amendments , which is intended to the european parliament past justice . 
it is completely uncontroversial issue , and as it , that turkey must civilised society , to past , although it should been how terrible . 
turkey membership with a and only the united states or nato place for geostrategic issues of , would the european union enrichment and important step towards a united europe . 
is no longer think , that only a small will turkey is europe ? 
therefore vote against this report , as we have voted against all reports , which are set ourselves the integration of the european union turkey . 
damage is before all then , if in turkey visit the on hopes , which is political situation , however , cannot be to . 
langenhagen by the committee on budgetary control report ( a5-0310 / 2000 ) the court of auditors report no 9 / 99 agricultural and fisheries research the measures ( fair-ohjelma , ' fishing , agriculture and agri-foodstuff sector research ' ) and the commission answers ( c5-0227 / 2000 - 2000 / 2133 ( cos ) ) 
. ( i ) i welcome this report and i am voting for it . 
the instead , that charter of fundamental rights would increase human rights and social rights , it facilitate measures , which the reduce . 
is not doubt , that the final destination is a precedent future european constitution , which , in turn is the eu quick road to the summit , when legally decisions is few strong by and all by the implemented . main objective is the european union monopolipääomien interests it workers and in general , peoples interests at the expense of . 
example is 2 ( 2 point : ' anyone is must condemn death and executed . 
in any despite our requests , not to mention , that family is a man and women , which increase the children , and that family is society unit . 
because these judges is not elected elected , this represents a democratic administration . 
certainly i wanted , that it should included in the european treaties directly . 
i abstained on the final vote , but because i think some social rights is in less clearly than economic rights . 
the convention original idea was to agreement of text , which 15 member states governments could change by the treaties binding . 
in the fight against social exclusion is been aid level it instead , that should obliged employers and state to respect fundamental rights binding . 
i , for convinced , that my secular is such a system and modern value . 
it is also ownership social binding nature of . 
this document is clearly not legally binding document , because it is not was . 
the irish government members have recently taken the questions the , might brussels irish identity and prime minister ahern , at the same time when he confirmed the irish eu membership is fundamental important ireland prosperity and economic success , opposed to all rapid changes towards liittovaltiomaisempaa - more dirigiste form of - europe , because it going much further than the part of european hopes or which european are prepared to accept . 
guess which won ? 
i note in passing , that this part-session seven report based on national initiatives , which is , that this system is very profitable there , where it is . 
these good mean measures are necessary , if to combat this phenomenon , which is constantly enlarged and kansainvälistynyt . 
this initiative presidency france proposes to do framework decision approximation of criminal law and money laundering the procedures ( , responsible specifically for detection , jäädytystä and seizure for ) . 
all member states is be treated rahapesua a crime , which must at least four years imprisoned . 
because money laundering is enormous amounts money throughout the world , is clear , that europol is to be power , it tähtäimenä european strategy of police cooperation and legal cooperation for . 
. ( i ) i welcome mr here the french initiative on the second report , which concerns judicial cooperation in the to ensure , that no obstacles is not of criminals , which suspected of money laundering or other similar crimes , which is illegal funds . 
mr president , this is the only report , which i voted against . 
it should the first member state , which geographically to bridging asia and which is mainly muslimiperinteet . 
it is particularly it phase , when we gradually more more eib : the resources , but we but fully covered by packages that we have economic risks . 
i 22 ) , that turkey perusjohtopäätöstä is not the copenhagen criteria , and many sentences , which turkey is received efforts and notify human rights , democratic freedoms and international of areas , and the european parliament similar recommendations turkey , that it equipped the european values . 
mr president , it concerns us , that turkey authorities and of the press is now not along these lines , but rather encouraging rohkaisuja press is to vastakkaisesti . 
nicosia is today , 11 years berlin wall wall after the european , the only been distributed capital . 
the progress is not yet been achieved enough , and turkey is continue efforts . 
mr president , mr council president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen , i would like to this debate cyprus on the report as . 
mr president , we we cannot accept morillon report , because the statements , we sure , that the accession process is improve peoples life - so as many want - but also in turkey is on the contrary . 
i but at the same time it with that situation , not paint too black of . 
it is therefore , there internal link . 
euro-välimeri-konferenssit in marseilles 
mr brok , which is now been we asked a large number , the negotiations the delays . 
we european is experience , which we can to . 
actually no longer is not essential , as in 1995 , only to relations with eastern europe , but we must also prepare union future enlargement . 
muukalaispelko , state by terror or other terror species of this area , and i hope , that also in this respect things is possible to order . 
this is fact , which we is unfortunately to live with . 
this is , however , we also be honest . 
all this is sign it , that this by achieved results arrangements makes them awareness , although i think answers are not yet situation level ; however , is admit , that five years is not so complex processes for much . 
this is why i believe , that our debate today can help us to understand , how the this policy is the european union . 
it is not needs between competition , but we must find new resources . 
in the middle east spiral of violence and violent and determined war the palestinian people - israel to it still law to country - threaten the the future . 
mr president , quite as the european union is find a balance in nice deepening and enlargement , it should create between in marseilles balanced relationship from the perspective of its and mediterranean area between the responsibility . 
in recent days can be done in many tilinpäätöksissä , which the barcelona process five years , but is it idea that we can be welcome , only already process continuity and the , that is ministerial meetings in israel , the palestinian authority , syria , lebanon and representatives . this is perhaps pays lip . 
the european and mediterranean area is now much common problems : illegal immigration , poverty , foreign debt , human rights , drought and terrorism , which is by innocent people and family life , which we - sad , - have seen in spain , in algeria or in the middle east . 
we prepared to believe them , but the countries need more than promises and speeches : we must give to what , they need . 
europe is not been any aavikoitumis- and water mediterranean the countries , and is important to a mediterranean the environmental policy , which would the mediterranean region , it characteristics and the climate diversity . 
the proposals this balance is much better involved . 
ago kosovo agency . 
we must disappoint their expectations , and those countries need help now more than never . 
i will , by saying that - i repeat the words the commission - these are the cornerstone of two proposal process , which at the end of these countries , which is been and is still much problems , can integrated fully european structures . 
we focus is a responsibility in future , also , if you agency for reconstruction of so you want , so that really is one person responsible for it body , which chooses these individual programmes . 
i thank therefore all colleagues , which are have this objective important , and i also welcome the , that we can to continue these countries more also content in this area . 
i read some bosnia elections on news , that äärinationalistit are won bosnia and herzegovina parliament . 
as you know , the european union is in determined these historic events to support . 
the westendorp and lagendijk reports draft regulations , with , which the second the framework programme and the second european agency for reconstruction , we its support to the union , which will to the western balkans region stabilisation and association process to support . 
so to long-awaited democracy victory in croatia and the after the european union yugoslavia germany , oblige as we know , to yet more . 
question time ( council ) 
the following questions on together , because they agree on subject : 
parties is been new four months deadline - resolution 1324 - which in seeks to achieve editystä these both areas . 
i would like to ask you morocco with the association agreement situation . 
. ( fr ) the stability and development are the european union one strategic priorities . 
what will discussions with turkey , we have just had this subject important debate , and you know , which are very union positions this issue . 
i would like only , that minister stress the proposed legislation , that it is for them , which use of and benefit from dire straits the people and not for it to immigrants or possible immigrants any more this . 
we need and legislation that practical to debate and to increase awareness . 
. ( fr ) i believe , that these crimes must to all possible means , absolutely all means , and i , so that the council of ministers union than the united nations general assembly , and , i believe this , also turkey government are prepared this . 
14 other member states took otherwise measures is therefore , that they are have the . 
i you example : if my country in france - and i am speaking now minister - in tomorrow power being predominantly right-wing extremist party , i would like , that my country to similar measures as the austria . 
in i wanted to values : i inspires the values , i charter of fundamental rights and the values i , including - really - any fight against discrimination , which is all european texts at the heart of the . we must respect for control . 
i would remind , that this political dialogue is the accession partnership - with - of the pre-accession strategy turkey , which defined in helsinki . 
question no 12 ( h-0850 / 00 ) : 
this we are , and we will to follow this line , and no other . 
this is to say , that marokkolainen side is answered community offer . 
these citizens will scotland , which 110 of being after person is either be prosecution or be released , and him must no longer never again to that crime . 
is taken concrete action , for example , hankintavarmuus ( and energy efficiency ) , so that member states economies are react so sensitive outside the future crises ? what are the council the instruments available and short and medium long-term priorities objectives effective use of energy and energiasäästöjen to achieve ? 
union position the united states legislation the extension of the measures outside is not changed . 
finally , i , that the european union concern the united nations agencies and programmes representatives on the ground by observations and that is why the union regrets the united states embargo negative and often dramatic consequences cuba population . 
is the council therefore understand , that problem is fully political , and that not acceptable to agree and - and that vainoajaan ? 
on the other hand this agency to the commission on the other hand , the hallinnointityöstä hajauttamispäätöstä is been excellent results . 
they are not no borders . we reject the cross-border crime is , are they ago drug trafficking , the cross-border criminal cooperation or trafficking in human beings in . 
should a good , if the commission commissioner patten , which is a experience - and perhaps viisauttakin - international crises in and which is visited different parts of the balkans , to agency for reconstruction päätoimintapaikkaan in thessaloniki to , how this agency is . 
but this is not the european myrskyisin area never been so full of hope than now . 
i would like to thank all before parliament the excellent work and the these two draft regulation in research . 
we have quickly results also in serbia , which the commission over four weeks is produced a total of eur 200 million hätäapuohjelman . 
we can , of course , accept the proposal , that the commission adopted by guidelines is reflect it to better efficiency , which to push ahead with our . 
i hope , that parliament understand may i proposals sagacity and to work constructively other with this very difficult this on , but i can support parliament amendments , which is unanimity . this should college position against . 
the third challenge in seoul asem summit was deepening and hallituskumppaneita for that for citizens . 
this of people between in principle throughout the asem process opening up possibility of civil society , although ngos initiative social forum is a could to , because certain asians partners opposed it . 
in we very happy that we , summit was in seoul and that all governments were there as heads of state or two , from . 
is adopted even two specific proposal the round table meeting globalisation and duo-vaihto-ohjelma , which is 4 300 partnership , which is the value 25 million dollars . 
the commission communication to to community and member states the competence of these points organisations in pollution resulting from a can be done . 
if we the the , that all the rannikkovaltioista only few is the economic , legal , legislative and political opportunities than the european union , understand , where extent we ask ourselves is , which is responsibility . 
common fisheries policy reform is a important , but real reforms to is still more important . 
hardly no farmed fish is an integral movement . 
we know the european union and very far from the borders both inside and outside . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , first i would like parliament to thank you support we in to and a